Category 01 · Series Circuit, Cable & Electrical Faults

AGL-CS-007 — Intermittent Series Circuit Fault

The AGL Knowledge Hub | Engineering Case Study Series. A difficult intermittent fault where runway edge lights extinguished and restored automatically — from fault logging and monitoring through connector movement testing to final resolution.

Case ID

AGL-CS-007

Category

Series Circuit & Fault Finding

Level

Advanced

Case Type

Engineering Simulation

Primary Skill

Intermittent fault diagnosis & fault reproduction

Important: This is an engineering simulation created for training. It is not presented as an actual airport incident. All readings, values, dates and outcomes are illustrative, and no airport, organisation, person or manufacturer is identified or implied.

1Case Study Overview

Airport maintenance personnel received repeated reports that a runway edge lighting circuit was switching between normal operation and partial failure.

During some inspections, all lights operated normally. During other inspections, a group of lights became extinguished for several minutes before returning to normal without any maintenance intervention.

The Constant Current Regulator (CCR) remained operational, and the fault could not be consistently reproduced during routine testing.

The investigation ultimately identified an intermittent electrical connection inside a moisture-damaged underground connector, which opened and closed under thermal expansion and mechanical movement.

This case demonstrates one of the most difficult fault conditions in AGL maintenance: a fault that is not continuously present.

2Learning Objectives

After completing this case study, the learner should be able to:

  • Understand the characteristics of intermittent AGL faults.
  • Differentiate intermittent faults from permanent open-circuit faults.
  • Apply fault-reproduction techniques.
  • Interpret unstable electrical measurements.
  • Investigate connectors and cable joints under operating conditions.
  • Use systematic isolation during intermittent fault diagnosis.
  • Verify long-term reliability after repair.

3System Background

An AGL series circuit consists of:

CCR → Primary Cable → Cable Joints → Isolating Transformers → Light Fixtures → Return

An intermittent fault may be caused by:

  • Loose electrical connections.
  • Corroded connectors.
  • Cracked conductors.
  • Moisture contamination.
  • Thermal expansion.
  • Mechanical vibration.
  • Cable movement.
  • Partial insulation failure.

Unlike permanent faults, intermittent faults may appear and disappear unpredictably.

4Problem Statement

The reported condition was:

  • Runway edge lights occasionally extinguished.
  • Affected lights restored automatically.
  • CCR remained energized.
  • No permanent circuit failure.
  • Fault more common during evening operation.
  • Recent rainfall reported.
Engineering Question

How can a fault be diagnosed when the circuit is normal during inspection?

5Initial Observations

CCR status Healthy
Selected current 6.6 A
Output current Stable during inspection
Fault duration 1–10 minutes
Affected lights L22–L29
Automatic restoration Yes
Weather Humid evenings

The automatic restoration of the lights indicated that the circuit interruption was not permanent.

6Initial Engineering Hypotheses

The maintenance team considered:

Hypothesis A

CCR output instability.

Hypothesis B

Intermittent cable-joint failure.

Hypothesis C

Connector movement causing circuit interruption.

Hypothesis D

Transformer primary connection intermittently opening.

Hypothesis E

Moisture-related insulation tracking.

7Diagnostic Challenge

The primary difficulty was that:

  • Continuity testing was normal.
  • Insulation resistance was acceptable.
  • Visual inspection showed no major damage.
  • The fault disappeared before measurements could be completed.

The investigation therefore focused on capturing the fault while it was occurring.

8Test Equipment

The investigation used:

  • True-RMS multimeter.
  • Data-logging current recorder.
  • Voltage recorder.
  • Insulation resistance tester.
  • Approved AGL circuit test equipment.
  • Connector inspection tools.
  • Thermal imaging camera.
  • Circuit drawings.
  • Airport-approved PPE.

9Investigation

Step 1: CCR Monitoring

Continuous monitoring showed:

Output current Stable
Output voltage Occasional brief fluctuations
CCR alarms None

The CCR did not exhibit internal instability.

Step 2: Fault Logging

A temporary voltage logger was installed. During one fault event:

  • Circuit voltage increased briefly.
  • Current regulation remained stable.
  • The affected lights extinguished.
  • Voltage returned to normal after restoration.

This suggested a temporary increase in circuit resistance or intermittent circuit opening.

Step 3: Physical Inspection During Operation

The maintenance team inspected the affected section while energized under approved procedures. One connector showed:

  • Moisture ingress.
  • Corrosion.
  • Slight mechanical looseness.

Step 4: Movement Test

After isolation, the connector was mechanically manipulated. Results:

  • Continuity repeatedly opened and closed.
  • Resistance changed significantly with movement.
  • The fault could now be reproduced.

Step 5: Thermal Cycling

The connector was subjected to moderate heating and cooling. Resistance varied significantly with temperature. This explained why the fault occurred mainly during evening temperature changes.

10Root Cause

Training-Case Finding

A moisture-damaged connector developed a partially fractured electrical contact.

Thermal expansion and mechanical movement intermittently opened the connection, causing temporary interruption of the affected circuit section. The circuit automatically restored when the contact re-established electrical continuity.

11Corrective Action

The maintenance team:

  1. Isolated the circuit.
  2. Removed the defective connector.
  3. Inspected adjacent connectors.
  4. Verified conductor condition.
  5. Installed an approved replacement connector.
  6. Improved connector sealing.
  7. Checked pit drainage.
  8. Performed continuity testing.
  9. Conducted insulation resistance testing.
  10. Monitored the circuit for several operational cycles.

12Post-Repair Verification

CCR operationNormal
Circuit currentStable
Voltage stabilityNormal
Intermittent faultNot observed
Field operationStable
Monitoring periodCompleted

The circuit was observed for multiple night operations with no recurrence.

13Root-Cause Analysis

Problem

Lights intermittently OFF.

CCR checked

Normal.

Continuous monitoring

Temporary voltage fluctuations.

Fault localized

Affected section identified.

Connector inspected

Movement-sensitive resistance.

Thermal testing

Fault reproduced.

Root Cause

Intermittent connector connection.

Corrective Action

Replace connector and verify long-term stability.

14Why This Case Was Difficult

Intermittent faults often:

  • Pass routine testing.
  • Disappear before measurement.
  • Mimic CCR problems.
  • Recur unpredictably.
  • Consume significant maintenance time.

The key engineering skill was fault reproduction. Without reproducing the fault, component replacement becomes guesswork.

15Engineering Lessons

01

A fault that disappears is not necessarily repaired.

A fault that disappears is not necessarily repaired.

02

Intermittent faults require monitoring.

Intermittent faults require monitoring, not just inspection.

03

Connector movement testing can reveal hidden defects.

Connector movement testing can reveal hidden electrical defects.

04

Thermal expansion changes contact resistance.

Thermal expansion can change contact resistance significantly.

05

Long-term post-repair monitoring is essential.

Long-term post-repair monitoring is essential for intermittent faults.

16Engineer's Decision Point

You observe: Lights occasionally extinguish. They restore automatically. CCR appears normal. Routine continuity tests are satisfactory. What should you investigate first?

A. Replace the CCR.
B. Replace all affected light fittings.
C. Monitor the circuit and reproduce the intermittent fault.
D. Increase CCR current.
Correct answer: C. Intermittent faults require monitoring and fault reproduction to identify the root cause, rather than guessing component replacement.

17Knowledge Check

Q1. What was the primary fault type?
Answer: Intermittent connector connection.
Q2. Why was the fault difficult to diagnose?
Answer: It was not continuously present.
Q3. What reproduced the fault?
Answer: Mechanical movement and thermal cycling.
Q4. Was the CCR defective?
Answer: No.
Q5. What was the key diagnostic technique?
Answer: Continuous monitoring and fault reproduction.

18Interview Questions

What is an intermittent AGL fault?
Why can intermittent faults pass continuity testing?
How would you reproduce an intermittent connector fault?
What role does thermal expansion play in electrical connections?
Why are data loggers useful during troubleshooting?
How can mechanical movement affect connector resistance?
What distinguishes an intermittent fault from a permanent open circuit?
Why should post-repair monitoring be extended?
What environmental conditions can trigger intermittent faults?
How would you prioritize investigation of an intermittent runway lighting fault?

Quick Reference: Airport Series Circuit Fault

An airport series circuit fault can be an open circuit, an earth fault or a high-resistance connection. Intermittent faults, as in this case, often come from a loose or damp connection that changes with temperature, vibration or moisture. Logging the CCR current and alarms against time helps to show the pattern.

19Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers about intermittent series circuit faults, based on this case study.

Q1What is AGL-CS-007?

AGL-CS-007 is an engineering training case study on an intermittent series circuit fault in which runway edge lights extinguished and then restored themselves. It is an engineering simulation created for training, not a report of an actual airport incident.

Q2Why are intermittent faults hard to diagnose?

The circuit was normal during many inspections, and the fault could not be consistently reproduced during routine testing. Lights went out for several minutes and came back without any maintenance, and the fault was more common during evening operation.

Q3How did the team catch a fault that kept disappearing?

The team used data-logging current and voltage recorders, a thermal imaging camera, connector inspection tools and insulation resistance testing. Monitoring the circuit and reproducing the fault were more effective than guessing at component replacement.

Q4What was the root cause?

A moisture-damaged underground connector developed a partially fractured electrical contact. Thermal expansion and mechanical movement intermittently opened the connection, and the circuit restored itself when the contact re-established continuity.

Q5Does a fault that disappears mean it has been repaired?

No. A fault that disappears is not necessarily repaired. The underlying defect remains until it is found and corrected, which is why this case stresses monitoring and fault reproduction.

Q6How was the circuit repaired?

The team isolated the circuit, removed the defective connector, inspected adjacent connectors and verified conductor condition. They installed an approved replacement connector, improved sealing, checked pit drainage, tested continuity and insulation resistance, and monitored the circuit for several operational cycles.

Q7How long was the circuit monitored after repair?

The circuit was observed over multiple night operations with no recurrence. CCR operation, circuit current and voltage stability were normal and the intermittent fault was not observed.

Q8What should you do if lights occasionally extinguish, restore automatically and routine continuity tests pass?

Monitor the circuit and reproduce the intermittent fault. Replacing the CCR or all affected fittings, or increasing CCR current, is guesswork and not the recommended approach.

Engineering & Expert Notes

Intermittent Faults Cluster Around Conditions

Pattern

Note time of day, temperature, rain and brightness step for each occurrence. The pattern points to expansion, moisture or vibration.

Gentle Movement Testing Can Expose a Weak Contact

Technique

Only under an approved, isolated procedure, controlled flexing of a suspect connection may reveal instability. Never do so on energised equipment.

Do Not Close the Job on a Self-Clearing Fault

Closure

A fault that went away has not been fixed. Keep it open for monitoring until the cause is found and corrected.

Replace Suspect Contacts Rather Than Cleaning Them

Repair

A partly fractured or corroded contact rarely recovers. Re-make the termination with new parts and seals.

20Case Study Conclusion

Key Engineering Principle

Intermittent series-circuit faults must be diagnosed through monitoring, fault reproduction, and dynamic testing rather than static electrical measurements alone.

Systematic analysis of connector movement, thermal behavior, voltage trends, and operational conditions can identify hidden intermittent defects that are invisible during routine inspections.

In AGL engineering, the ability to reproduce an intermittent fault is often the turning point between repeated temporary repairs and permanent fault elimination.

Go Deeper

Turn Case Studies Into Engineering Capability

A case study shows you how a problem is investigated. Precision AGL Academy helps you build the knowledge to understand why it happens, diagnose it systematically, and apply the right engineering approach.

Study real-world-style engineering scenarios, identify failure patterns, understand root causes, and develop a systematic approach to AGL troubleshooting.

Study the case. Understand the system. Build the skill.

Build Your Knowledge Across
Fundamentals Electrical Systems Fault Finding Photometry Installation Testing Commissioning Maintenance