AGL Component Library By Precision AGL Academy

T‑VASIS

T‑Visual Approach Slope Indicator System – a 20-light, all-white glide slope system arranged as a wing bar plus "fly-up"/"fly-down" indicator lights forming a T-shape on the ground. T‑VASIS provides precise, graduated glide path guidance for larger aircraft with higher cockpit eye heights, normally set to the same standard 3° path as PAPI and VASI (adjustable up to around 4° at sites with specific obstacle clearance or noise abatement needs), making it well suited to airports serving large transport aircraft.

T-VASIS (T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System) wing bar and fly-line light layout

Image disclaimer: For identification and illustration only. It may show a product by another manufacturer and may not depict the exact item described; it is not a statement of any product’s quality, approval or performance. Third-party image and trademark rights belong to their owners. See full notice.

Overview

What Is It?

The T‑Visual Approach Slope Indicator System (T‑VASIS) is a visual glide slope guidance system built from 20 light units, all of which emit white light in normal operation — unlike PAPI and VASI, T‑VASIS does not rely on a red/white colour split. The units are arranged as a central "wing bar" (also called the crossbar) of four lights running across the approach direction (the "top" of the T), together with two "fly lines" (also called stems) of lights running down the approach path on either side of it that light up progressively to show "fly-up" or "fly-down" corrections. The T‑shaped configuration provides a more precise and intuitive graduated indication of the aircraft's position relative to the correct glide path, particularly for larger aircraft with higher cockpit eye heights.

T‑VASIS was originally developed in Australia to give pilots of larger aircraft a more precise, graduated glide-path read than a simple two-colour bar, by encoding how far off path an aircraft is directly in the number of fly-up or fly-down lights illuminated alongside the wing bar. It is normally set to the same standard 3° glide path as PAPI and VASI; like any VGSI, the angle can be adjusted (typically up to around 4°) at sites with specific obstacle clearance or noise abatement requirements. It was historically used at military airfields and some commercial airports, though ICAO Annex 14 has recommended discontinuing T‑VASIS and AT‑VASIS as standard systems since 1 January 2020, so it is increasingly found only at legacy or military installations.

Purpose

Purpose & Function

T-VASIS exists to give pilots a more precise and immediately readable glide slope indication than a simple two-colour bar system, using the number of illuminated fly-up or fly-down lights as the signal: how many lights show alongside the wing bar, and on which side, tells the pilot at a glance not just whether they're on path but roughly how far off and in which direction. This matters most for larger aircraft with higher cockpit eye heights, where the viewing geometry to a standard PAPI or VASI bar can be harder to judge precisely.

Where a steeper angle is needed for obstacle clearance or noise abatement, T‑VASIS — like any VGSI — can be set up to around 4° instead of the standard 3°, giving airport planners a way to steepen the visual glide path over a specific approach without redesigning the whole runway environment or necessarily changing the electronic glide path if one exists.

Application

Where Is It Used?

T‑VASIS is deployed on runways where a steeper glide path or enhanced precision is required:

  • Military airfields – supporting tactical approaches and training for large transport aircraft.
  • Commercial airports with obstacle constraints – where terrain or buildings require a steeper approach angle.
  • Airports with noise abatement procedures – where steeper approaches reduce noise footprint.
  • Runways serving large transport aircraft – such as C‑17, C‑130, or commercial wide‑bodies.
  • Airfields with high approach speeds – where a more precise glide path reference is beneficial.
  • As a complement to ILS – providing visual backup to instrument guidance.
Placement

Installation & Location

The T-VASIS array is mounted on one side of the runway (normally the left), set back from the threshold at the distance needed to place the wing bar's on-slope indication over the threshold at the correct height, and tied into the runway centreline and threshold survey. The wing bar and the two fly-up/fly-down lines of lights are set out together as a single surveyed group, symmetrically about the runway centreline, so the T shape reads correctly from the cockpit at the design glide angle, with each unit on its own frangible mount at a fixed lateral offset from the runway edge, clear of the obstacle-limitation surface. Every unit is individually aimed and levelled during commissioning so the fly-up and fly-down lights illuminate in the correct sequence as the aircraft deviates above or below the glide path. Cabling runs underground from each unit back to its constant current regulator, and the larger footprint compared to PAPI or VASI — T-VASIS installations typically extend around 500 m along the runway from just beyond the threshold — means clearance and frangibility requirements are checked across the full array, not just a single bar.

Function

How Does It Work?

T‑VASIS operates on a fundamentally different principle from PAPI and VASI: instead of a colour transition, it signals deviation through which and how many white lights are illuminated, with red reserved only as a severe-deviation warning. The system consists of:

  • Configuration: Twenty light units arranged symmetrically about the runway centreline, in the form of two "wing bars" of four lights each (one wing bar on each side, together forming the horizontal top of the T) and two bisecting longitudinal "fly lines" of six lights each (forming the vertical stem of the T on each side). All units project white light in normal operation.
  • Colour Indication: The pilot reads the number and position of illuminated lights, not a colour split:
    • On the correct glide path: Only the wing bar is visible, steady white. No fly-up or fly-down lights are lit.
    • Above the glide path: The wing bar plus one, two, or three "fly-down" lights are visible — the more fly-down lights lit, the further above the slope.
    • Below the glide path: The wing bar plus one, two, or three "fly-up" lights are visible — the more fly-up lights lit, the further below the slope.
    • Well below the glide path: The wing bar and fly-up lights change from white to red as a distinct, higher-severity warning that the aircraft is significantly low.
  • Configurable Approach Angle: Like PAPI and VASI, T‑VASIS is normally set to the standard 3° glide path; it can be set up to around 4° at sites with obstacle clearance or noise-abatement needs.
  • Power and Control: T‑VASIS units are powered from the constant current series circuit via isolating transformers, with intensity controlled by the CCR (typically 3‑step or 5‑step).
  • Integration: T‑VASIS is typically deployed independently or integrated with the runway lighting system and ALCMS.
Architecture

System Architecture & Control Logic

T‑VASIS encodes its signal entirely through fixed optical geometry across two arrays that share one control layer. The wing-bar units are aimed to appear steady white only near the correct glide-path angle. Each fly-line unit's lens/reflector is tilted at commissioning so it switches on at a specific elevation deviation from the design glide path, with units spaced along the fly line so that, together, they show progressively more fly-down lights above the design glide path (typically 3°, or up to around 4° where a steeper angle has been set for site-specific reasons) and progressively more fly-up lights below it — the fly-up units also switch from white to red once the deviation passes a severe-low threshold. That geometry is set once, mechanically, and re-verified by ground or flight check — no processor decides which unit lights up. Both the wing bar and the fly lines draw from the same constant current series circuit through their own isolating transformers, and the CCR (typically 3‑step or 5‑step, sometimes via ALCMS) sets one shared brightness level for the entire T — wing bar and fly lines together — for day, twilight, or night. Loop-level fault monitoring is standard series-circuit practice: a voltage rise at constant current flags an open lamp or failed transformer as a loop fault, without distinguishing which wing-bar or fly-line unit is affected until sectionalised testing is done.

CCR / ALCMS → Series Circuit Loop → Isolating Transformer → Wing Bar & Fly-Line Units (each fixed to its own switch-on angle)

CCR / ALCMS Selects shared brightness step for the whole T SERIES CIRCUIT LOOP Same current to wing bar and fly lines — brightness only ISOLATING TRANSFORMER (PER UNIT) Taps fixed loop current to each light unit WING BAR 4 units, steady white only near design glide path FLY-LINE UNITS Progressively switch on above/below the glide path SIGNAL IS OPTICAL, NOT ELECTRONIC The T-pattern comes from fixed aim on every unit, not from any command the circuit sends
Pilot's View

Reading the T

The same array reads differently depending on where the aircraft sits relative to the glide path: on slope only the wing bar shows, steady white; above slope the wing bar plus one to three white fly-down lights show, more lights the further above; below slope the wing bar plus one to three fly-up lights show — turning red if well below the slope.

ON GLIDE PATH Wing bar only — no fly lights lit ABOVE GLIDE PATH Wing bar + 2 fly-down lights (white) BELOW GLIDE PATH Wing bar + 1 fly-up light (white)
White light unit — illuminated
Red — fly-up lights only, once well below slope
Extinguished / not visible
Construction

Physical Construction

Each unit in the T-VASIS array is an individual box-section housing in die-cast aluminium alloy or louvred galvanised steel, projecting a single white beam that switches on or off as a whole (with the fly-up units able to switch to red for the severe-deviation warning) rather than a split red/white beam like PAPI or VASI; the fly-line units run in line along the approach path and the wing-bar units run perpendicular to it, together forming the ground-visible "T" pattern. Optics are shaped as a lens/reflector assembly tuned to the fixture's role in the array, with a built-in levelling and pitch-adjustment mechanism used to aim each unit precisely to the set glide-path angle during commissioning. Every unit mounts on its own frangible mast at a fixed, surveyed height, engineered to shear away cleanly if struck, and units are spaced and wired individually so the control system can switch fly-up or fly-down lights independently as the aircraft departs the glide path. Cabling runs underground in conduit to isolating transformers housed in nearby base cans, with sealed, direct-burial connectors and a drainage provision to keep the transformers and cable entries free of standing water.

Specification

Technical Parameters

ParameterTypical Value
Light SourceLED array or 65W/100W halogen lamp
ColourWhite (all units, normal operation); fly-up units switch to red only as a severe-below-path warning
Luminous IntensityUp to 20,000 cd (white) and 10,000 cd (red, severe-deviation fly-up units only) depending on setting
Intensity Steps3‑step (day, twilight, night) or 5‑step (2.8A – 6.6A) CCR controlled
Glide Path AngleTypically 3° (same as PAPI/VASI); adjustable up to ~4° for site-specific obstacle/noise requirements
Beam PatternNarrow beam per unit, switched fully on/off rather than colour-transitioning — deviation is read from which units are lit, not a beam colour split
ConfigurationT‑shaped: wing bar (4+4 units, crossing the approach) + two fly lines (6+6 units, running down the approach path)
Total Light Units20 (full T-VASIS, symmetric both sides of runway centreline)
Mounting TypeElevated (frangible poles) – typically 10–20 m from runway edge
Isolating Transformer65W – 100W (6.6A series circuit) per unit
Protection ClassIP67 / IP68 (weather‑resistant)
Operating Temperature-40°C to +55°C
Power Supply

Electrical Requirements

RequirementTypical Value
Circuit TypeSeries circuit, constant current (CCR fed)
Rated Series Current6.6A (5-step: 2.8A / 3.4A / 4.1A / 5.2A / 6.6A) or 3-step equivalent
IsolationVia dedicated isolating transformer (65W–100W) per unit
Circuit ConfigurationWing bar and fly-line units wired as separate series circuits, synchronised by the CCR/control system
Transformer SecondaryMatched to fixture wattage; sized to series circuit rating
Cable TypeL-824 single-conductor, direct-burial rated, 5kV or 600V per circuit design
ConnectorL-823 primary connector, submersible-rated splice
Insulation Resistance≥ 50 MΩ (megger test, cable-to-ground)
Earthing/GroundingFixture body and base can bonded to airfield earth grid
Fault ProtectionCCR-level ground fault and open-circuit detection
Power SourceCCR output, regulated per ICAO/FAA intensity step schedule
Optical Performance

Photometric Requirements

ParameterTypical Value
Main Beam Intensity (White)≥ 14,000 cd on-axis per unit, up to 20,000 cd at full intensity
Main Beam Intensity (Red)≥ 7,000 cd on-axis per unit, up to 10,000 cd at full intensity (fly-up units, severe-deviation state only)
Switch-On Sharpness≤ 4 arc-minutes vertical transition band per fly-line unit (angle at which each unit switches on, not a colour transition)
Vertical Beam SpreadFly-line units spaced at fixed increments about the design glide-path reference (typically 3°, adjustable up to ~4° where required); wing bar fixed at the on-slope reference angle
Horizontal Beam Spread± 5° to ± 10° either side of runway centreline plane
Isocandela DistributionPer ICAO Annex 14 Attachment A / relevant national civil aviation authority T-VASIS figures
Chromaticity (White)Within ICAO Annex 14 white boundary (CIE coordinates)
Chromaticity (Red)Within ICAO Annex 14 red boundary (CIE coordinates)
Intensity Tolerance± 25% of rated value at each CCR step (field measurement)
Maintenance Factor≥ 50% of new-fixture intensity before lamp/lens replacement is due
Test MethodMobile photometric van/goniophotometer or fixed test bench per unit
Compliance

Applicable Standards

ICAO Annex 14

Specifications for T‑VASIS visual approach slope indicators

FAA AC 150/5340-25

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) Systems – closest FAA equivalent guidance; T‑VASIS is primarily governed outside the US by ICAO Annex 14 and national CAAs

UK CAA CAP 168

Licensing of aerodromes – T‑VASIS requirements

IEC/TS 61827

Characteristics of inset and elevated luminaires used on aerodromes and heliports (photometric & electrical performance)

Prerequisites

Installation Requirements

Array Setout & Threshold Survey Tie
Civil

Set out the wing bar and fly-line group as a single surveyed unit tied to the runway centreline and threshold survey, positioning the wing bar to place the on-slope indication at the design height over the threshold.

Frangible Pole Foundations
Civil

Install footings for each elevated frangible pole 10–20 m from the runway edge, clear of the obstacle-limitation surface, holding the full array's footprint within its surveyed positions.

Duct & Cable Route to CCR
Electrical

Run underground cabling from each bar back to its constant current regulator, keeping the larger multi-bar array's circuits separately traceable.

Isolating Transformer Matching
Electrical

Confirm each unit's 65W–100W isolating transformer matches the series circuit's rated current step before connection.

Unit-by-Unit Aiming & Levelling
Mechanical

Individually aim and level every bar in the array during commissioning so the fly bars illuminate in the correct sequence as the aircraft deviates above or below the design glide path.

Frangible Coupling Fixing
Mechanical

Torque frangible pole couplings to the specified value across the full array, confirming each fitting shears independently under lateral load.

Full-Array Clearance Check
Documentation

Verify clearance and frangibility requirements across the complete wing-bar-and-fly-line footprint, not just a single bar, before energisation.

Pre-Energisation Sign-off
Documentation

Record survey coordinates, cable routes, and torque values for every bar in the array as-built before the site is closed.

Verification

Testing & Commissioning

Insulation Resistance (Megger) Test
Pre-Energisation

Megger-test each unit's isolating transformer and the series loop before energisation, confirming insulation resistance clears the acceptable minimum ahead of backfill.

Loop Continuity & Resistance Test
Pre-Energisation

Verify series loop continuity end to end across the wing-bar and fly-line units and record total loop resistance, ruling out open circuits or high-resistance splices before first energisation.

Primary/Secondary Voltage Verification
Energisation

With the CCR energised, confirm secondary voltage at each unit's connector matches the transformer's rated ratio at the commissioned current step.

Independent Switching Verification
Energisation

Confirm each fly-up and fly-down unit switches independently under control system command, since correct glide-path indication depends on individual units illuminating in the right combination as the aircraft departs the slope.

Glide Path Angle Verification
Final Acceptance

Set each unit's aiming angle with a calibrated aiming tool or theodolite to the design glide-path angle (typically 3°, or the site-specific angle up to ~4° where set steeper), confirming the wing bar and fly lines together present a correctly aligned "T" from the approach.

Photometric Commissioning Test
Final Acceptance

Measure beam intensity, colour, and transition sharpness on each unit with a calibrated photometer against ICAO/FAA commissioning tolerances.

Frangibility & Mounting Verification
Pre-Energisation

Confirm each unit's frangible mast shear point, base height, and surveyed position meet as-built tolerances before the site is finally backfilled.

Documentation & As-Built Sign-off
Final Acceptance

Record insulation, continuity, voltage, switching logic, and photometric readings for all units alongside as-built position and aiming angles in the commissioning dossier.

Upkeep

Inspection & Maintenance

Wing Bar & Fly-Line Alignment Check
Annual

Calibrate every unit in the multi-unit fly lines and the wing bar with precision optical tools, since the full T-shaped configuration is more complex to align than a standard PAPI or VASI.

Photometric Intensity Check
Annual

Verify white beam intensity on all units, and confirm the fly-up units' red switch-over point, against ICAO thresholds using a calibrated photometer.

Lens Cleaning
Quarterly

Clean dust, rubber deposits, and de-icing fluid residue from each unit's lens; the complex optical system of T-VASIS is particularly sensitive to contamination.

Lamp / LED Module Inspection
Semi-annual

Check each unit's light source for failure; with more units than a standard PAPI or VASI, the risk of an individual failure producing a misleading indication is higher.

Frangible Coupling Check
Annual

Inspect couplings for fatigue from wind loading and thermal cycling and replace on schedule to preserve breakaway performance.

Insulation Resistance Test
Annual

Megger-test each unit's isolating transformer and series circuit to confirm insulation resistance stays above the minimum, flagging moisture ingress before it causes a fault.

Cable & Connector Inspection
Annual

Examine primary and secondary cable connections for corrosion or loose crimps, a common source of intermittent series-circuit faults.

Mounting Pole Inspection
Annual

Check pole verticality and base condition across the full wing-bar and fly-line array to keep the T-shaped indication correctly positioned.

Field Notes

Common Field Issues

Complex Alignment Calibration

The T‑shaped configuration requires precise alignment of both the fly lines and the wing bar. Each unit must be carefully calibrated to the correct angle to provide a consistent glide path. This is more complex than standard VASI or PAPI. Regular calibration using precision optical tools is essential.

Lens Contamination

Dust, rubber deposits, and de‑icing fluids can reduce light output and, on fly-up units, blur the white-to-red severe-deviation switch. The multi-unit optical system of T‑VASIS is particularly sensitive to contamination given its larger unit count. Routine cleaning and photometric testing are required to maintain the integrity of the indication.

Lamp or LED Module Failure

With more units than a standard PAPI or VASI, the risk of individual lamp or LED failure is higher. Regular inspections and prompt replacement are necessary to avoid misleading indications.

Frangible Coupling Fatigue

T‑VASIS units are mounted on frangible poles. Wind loading and thermal cycling can weaken couplings. Regular inspection ensures breakaway performance on impact.

Pilot Training Requirements

The T‑VASIS indication is less intuitive than PAPI or VASI. Pilots must be specifically trained to interpret the T‑shaped display correctly. Airfields using T‑VASIS should ensure that their regular operators are familiar with the system.

Diagnostics

Troubleshooting Guide

One Wing-Bar or Fly-Line Unit Dark, Others Normal
Likely Cause
Failed LED module / lamp in that unit, or an open isolating transformer feeding it — with more units than PAPI or VASI, individual failures are more common.
Diagnostic Steps
Confirm series loop continuity through the affected unit's transformer primary; megger the transformer; check secondary voltage at the connector with the CCR energised.
Corrective Action
Replace the failed lamp/LED module if the transformer checks healthy; otherwise swap the isolating transformer and re-seal the connectors before backfill.
Entire Series Circuit Dark / CCR Will Not Regulate
Likely Cause
Open-circuit fault in the series loop feeding the wing-bar and fly-line units (severed cable, corroded splice, or a failed transformer acting as an open point).
Diagnostic Steps
Check the CCR fault/open-circuit indication first; loop-resistance test from the CCR output to isolate the faulted segment; sectionalise and megger cable runs between the wing-bar and fly-line arrays.
Corrective Action
Excavate and repair or replace the faulted cable section and connector; re-test insulation resistance before reinstating the circuit.
CCR Trips on Overcurrent or Ground Fault
Likely Cause
Moisture ingress at a unit, connector, or base can has degraded insulation resistance, creating a short or partial ground fault on the series loop.
Diagnostic Steps
Megger the full circuit to identify the low-resistance segment; visually inspect suspect units on both the wing bar and fly lines for cracked gaskets, condensation, or damaged secondary cable jackets.
Corrective Action
Dry out or replace the affected unit/connector, renew O-rings and gaskets, and confirm insulation resistance is back above the acceptable minimum before re-energising.
Ambiguous or Incorrect T-Shaped Indication
Likely Cause
One or more wing-bar or fly-line units have drifted from their commissioned elevation setting, which is more consequential in T-VASIS given the complexity of aligning both arrays to work together.
Diagnostic Steps
Carry out a ground or flight inspection of the full T-shaped indication against design values at multiple deviation points; check each unit's levelling and pitch-adjustment setting on both the wing bar and fly lines.
Corrective Action
Re-aim and re-level the affected unit(s) to the surveyed angle using precision optical tools, then re-verify the complete indication with a follow-up inspection.
Reduced or Uneven Light Output
Likely Cause
Hazy or contaminated lens (the complex optical system is particularly sensitive to this), an aging LED array or halogen lamp, or the CCR running on a lower brightness step than required.
Diagnostic Steps
Run a photometric intensity check against ICAO/FAA thresholds; inspect and clean the lens; confirm the CCR is set to the correct intensity step for prevailing conditions.
Corrective Action
Clean or replace the lens, replace a degraded lamp/LED module, or correct the CCR step setting; re-verify with a follow-up photometric reading.
Unit Leaning, Loose, or Misaligned
Likely Cause
Frangible coupling on a wing-bar or fly-line unit has begun to fatigue or partially shear, or a base footing has settled due to ground movement.
Diagnostic Steps
Visually and physically check the frangible coupling for cracking or play; re-check unit aim against tolerance; inspect the surrounding ground for settlement or heave.
Corrective Action
Replace the frangible coupling on schedule if fatigued, re-level and re-aim the unit, and address any footing settlement to prevent recurrence.
Reliability

Failure Modes & Root Causes

LED Module / Lamp Failure
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Solder-joint fatigue from thermal cycling, moisture ingress through a compromised board seal, or ordinary end-of-life lumen depreciation.
Effect
A dark unit in the wing bar or the fly lines — with the full T-VASIS array's larger unit count, a single failure has less effect on the overall indication than on the abbreviated AT-VASIS, but repeated failures degrade readability.
Detection Method
Megger test of the transformer, secondary voltage check with the CCR energised, and visual confirmation that the full wing-bar and fly-line pattern is alight.
Isolating Transformer Failure
High Severity
Root Cause
Moisture ingress leading to insulation breakdown, a manufacturing defect in the winding, or a blown primary fuse-wire link from a transient surge.
Effect
Open-circuit point in the series loop; darkens the affected unit or, if the open extends to the loop itself, can take down the whole wing-bar or fly-line circuit.
Detection Method
Megger test of the transformer, secondary voltage check with the CCR energised, and loop-resistance testing from the CCR output.
Wing-Bar or Fly-Line Unit Elevation Drift
High Severity
Root Cause
Gradual footing settlement, vibration-induced loosening of the pitch-adjustment mechanism, or an aiming error introduced during maintenance.
Effect
An incorrect number of fly-up or fly-down lights showing, or a mismatched wing-bar reference, disrupting the "reading the T" indication pilots rely on to judge deviation.
Detection Method
Ground or flight inspection of the complete T-shaped indication against design values, and periodic check of each unit's levelling and pitch-adjustment setting.
Series Cable / Connector Insulation Breakdown
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Cable jacket damage, corroded splices, or prolonged standing water in the longer duct runs connecting the multiple wing-bar and fly-line units.
Effect
Ground fault or short circuit that trips the CCR, or an intermittent partial fault that degrades insulation resistance across the loop.
Detection Method
Full-circuit megger test to flag the low-resistance segment, followed by sectionalised testing to pinpoint the fault location.
Lens Contamination or Erosion
Low Severity
Root Cause
Prolonged UV exposure, abrasive particulate erosion, and grime or rubber-deposit build-up on the outer lens surface.
Effect
Reduced or hazy light output and a softened colour transition on the affected unit, making the T pattern harder to read at range.
Detection Method
Scheduled photometric intensity testing against ICAO/FAA thresholds and visual inspection of the lens during quarterly cleaning.
Frangible Coupling Fatigue
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Cyclic loading from mower or vehicle contact, material fatigue over the service interval, or corrosion at the coupling threads.
Effect
Unit leans, loosens, or separates from its base, taking that wing-bar or fly-line light out of aim tolerance or out of service.
Detection Method
Physical inspection for cracking or play in the coupling, and periodic fixture-aim/level checks against tolerance.
Precautions

Safety & Operational Notes

Series Circuit Isolation
Electrical Safety

The wing-bar and fly-line units run on a constant-current series circuit that can carry several kV across the loop. De-energise and lock out the CCR, then verify zero energy at the fixture before opening a base can or handling cable connectors.

Airside Work Coordination
Operational

Any work on or near an active runway requires ATC/airside coordination and a NOTAM while a wing-bar or fly-line unit is dark or out of tolerance, with vehicle and personnel movement kept clear of the runway strip given the wider footprint of the full T-VASIS array.

Frangibility Not to Be Defeated
Mechanical

Never substitute the frangible coupling with a rigid fitting or over-torque it during installation or repair; the coupling must still shear cleanly on aircraft impact to limit damage under the frangibility requirement.

Verify the Full "T" Before Return to Service
Operational

After maintenance touching any wing-bar or fly-line unit, confirm the complete T-shaped indication reads correctly from the approach; an isolated unit can appear fine in isolation while still disrupting the overall pattern pilots use to judge deviation.

FOD Control at the Base Can
Operational

Keep tools, fasteners, and removed gaskets accounted for at all times when the base can is open, and secure or remove any loose material before reinstating the fixture, to prevent foreign object debris on the movement area.

Insulation Test Before Re-Energisation
Electrical Safety

After any cable, connector, or transformer work, megger test the affected series loop before restoring power, since a residual fault at re-energisation can trip the CCR or damage other units on the same circuit — a larger risk here given the longer duct runs connecting the multiple wing-bar and fly-line units.

PPE & Grounding
Personnel Safety

Use insulated tools and appropriate PPE when working on series-circuit connections, and confirm the fixture and base can are bonded/grounded per the electrical design before reconnecting the loop.

Restore to Compliant State
Compliance

Do not leave a wing-bar or fly-line unit out of aim tolerance, at reduced intensity, or otherwise non-compliant after maintenance; verify photometric and positional conformance across the full array before closing out the work and cancelling the associated NOTAM.

Field Insight

Engineering & Expert Notes

Exercise the Fly-Down Wing Bars Deliberately
Maintenance

The fly-down wing bar units only illuminate when an aircraft is significantly below the glide path, so a fault in that string can go undetected for a long time under normal traffic; include a deliberate functional test of the fly-down units in the routine rather than waiting for it to be triggered operationally.

Aim the Wing Bar and Fly Lines as One Coordinated System
Alignment

Because the T-shape depends on a pilot reading multiple bars together, an aim inconsistency between the wing bar and the fly lines can create a confusing or contradictory picture even if each bar individually passes its own check; verify the full T as a set against a single baseline.

Re-Confirm the Obstacle Basis at Each Major Overhaul
Compliance

As with AT-VASIS, the steeper 3.5°–4° angle is usually set for a specific obstacle or noise reason; document that basis so a future overhaul doesn't inadvertently "correct" the angle back toward a standard 3°.

More Light Units Means Single-String Failures Are Easier to Miss
Inspection

The larger unit count that gives T-VASIS its precision also means a single failed light is a smaller fraction of the visible picture and easier to overlook on a routine walk-by; track per-unit status individually rather than assessing the system as a whole at a glance.

Confirm Which Maintenance Authority's Schedule Applies
Compliance

Where T-VASIS serves a military airfield, confirm which maintenance authority's schedule governs the site rather than assuming the civil aeronautical information publication cycle applies by default.

The Wider Footprint Sees More Ground Equipment Damage
Durability

Mowing, snow clearing, and other ground equipment operating around the wider T-VASIS array have more opportunities to clip a unit or cable run than a compact PAPI installation; brief ground crews on the extended clearance zone specifically.

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions

Short answers about T-VASIS: the 20-light system, signal meaning, specifications, circuits, standards and maintenance.

Q1What is T-VASIS?

The T-Visual Approach Slope Indicator System is a glide slope guidance system of 20 light units, all white in normal operation. Unlike PAPI and VASI it does not rely on a red/white colour split.

Q2How does a pilot read T-VASIS?

Deviation is read from which and how many lights show alongside the wing bar. Red is reserved only as a severe below-path warning on the fly-up units.

Q3What is the T-VASIS configuration?

A T shape: a wing bar of 4+4 units across the approach and two fly lines of 6+6 units running down the approach path, symmetric about the runway centreline, for 20 units in total.

Q4Where is T-VASIS used?

On runways needing a steeper glide path or enhanced precision, including military airfields and commercial airports with obstacle constraints.

Q5What are the typical specifications?

An LED array or 65/100 W halogen lamp, up to 20,000 cd white (10,000 cd red on fly-up units in the severe-deviation state), a 3 degree glide path adjustable to about 4 degrees, and frangible elevated mounting.

Q6How is T-VASIS powered?

From a constant current series circuit through 65-100 W isolating transformers. The wing bar and fly-line units are wired as separate series circuits synchronised by the CCR and control system.

Q7What photometric performance is expected?

At least 14,000 cd white and 7,000 cd red on-axis per unit, a switch-on transition of 4 arc-minutes or less per fly-line unit, and chromaticity within the ICAO Annex 14 white and red boundaries.

Q8Which standards apply to T-VASIS?

ICAO Annex 14, UK CAA CAP 168, IEC/TS 61827, and FAA AC 150/5340-25 as the closest FAA equivalent guidance, since T-VASIS is mainly governed outside the US by ICAO and national authorities.

Q9How often should T-VASIS be maintained?

Quarterly lens cleaning, semi-annual light source inspection, and annual wing bar and fly-line alignment, photometric checks, frangible coupling inspection and insulation resistance tests. Alignment is more complex than for PAPI or VASI.

Q10What if one wing-bar or fly-line unit is dark?

With 20 units, individual failures are more common. Suspect a failed LED module or lamp, or an open isolating transformer, and confirm series loop continuity through the transformer primary.

Explore Further

Related Components

Go Further

Go Beyond the Component. Understand the Complete AGL System.

You have explored the component. Now understand how it works within the complete Airfield Ground Lighting system.

Learn AGL from fundamentals to design, installation, testing, photometry, commissioning, maintenance and troubleshooting through structured technical training at Precision AGL Academy.

Build practical knowledge. Understand the circuit. Read the standards. Troubleshoot with confidence.

Your next step in AGL starts here.

The Learning Pathway
Learn Understand Design Test Maintain Document Apply Certify

Need expert guidance on T‑VASIS selection, installation, or calibration?

Precision AGL Academy provides advice on glide path design, photometric performance, and field alignment of T‑VASIS systems for military and commercial applications.