Division 13 of 25 · Failure Database

Approach Lighting Failures

The dedicated failure classification for approach-lighting systems — covering the complete chain from individual approach-light fixture failure through electrical, structural, optical, alignment, control and weather-related failures. Approach lighting differs from ordinary runway/taxiway lighting because failures can involve elevated structures, crossbars, poles, foundations and frangible components, in addition to the lighting/electrical system. Do not record an approach light simply as “failed.” Identify the failure mode, the affected component or structure, the technical mechanism, the operational consequence and the corrective action.

20 / 20
Topics Published
ALF-01 → 20
Failure ID Range
6 Groups
Lighting & Component · Structural & Mechanical · Optical & Alignment · Environmental · Circuit & Control · System-Level
Rev 0
Initial Issue

Key principle — Division 13 distinguishes component failure, structural failure, lighting-service failure and system-level failure. A failed light should never simply be logged as “approach light failed” — every record should trace the actual technical mechanism: what failed → how did it fail → why did it fail → what evidence confirmed it → how was it corrected → how can recurrence be prevented?

Division 13 · Approach Lighting Failure Topics

20 of 20 topics published
A
Lighting & Component Failures
7 topics
ALF-01 Approach Fixture Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of an individual approach-light fixture resulting in loss or degradation of its intended lighting function.

Possible Causes
  • Lamp/LED failure
  • Driver failure
  • Transformer failure
  • Cable/connector failure
  • Moisture ingress
  • Optical damage
  • Mechanical damage
  • Internal wiring failure
Possible Consequences
  • Individual light outage
  • Reduced approach-lighting continuity
  • Incorrect visual pattern
  • Reduced approach guidance effectiveness
Investigation
  • Fixture condition
  • Lamp/LED
  • Driver
  • Transformer
  • Cable
  • Connector
  • Optical system
  • Mounting/alignment
  • Environmental condition
ALF-02 Lamp Failure
Failure Definition

Failure or burnout of a lamp used in an approach-lighting fixture.

Possible Causes
  • End-of-life
  • Electrical abnormality
  • Overheating
  • Voltage/current abnormality
  • Mechanical/thermal stress
Consequences
  • Individual fixture outage
  • Pattern discontinuity
  • Reduced approach-lighting effectiveness
Investigation — Verify
SUPPLYTRANSFORMERSECONDARY CIRCUITLAMPOPTICAL OUTPUT
ALF-03 LED Failure
Failure Definition

Failure or degradation of LED light sources used in approach-lighting fixtures.

Possible Causes
  • Ageing
  • Thermal stress
  • Electrical stress
  • Driver failure
  • Environmental exposure
Consequences
  • Reduced output
  • Uneven illumination
  • Fixture outage
  • Optical-performance degradation
ALF-04 Driver Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of the electronic driver supplying or controlling an LED approach-light fixture.

Possible Symptoms
  • No output
  • Reduced brightness
  • Flickering
  • Intermittent operation
  • Incorrect intensity
Investigation — Check
INPUT SUPPLYDRIVERLED MODULEOPTICAL OUTPUT
ALF-05 Cable Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of cables supplying or interconnecting approach-lighting equipment.

Possible Failure Modes
  • Open circuit
  • Short circuit
  • Earth fault
  • Insulation breakdown
  • Mechanical damage
  • Water ingress
  • Cable ageing
Investigation
  • Continuity
  • Insulation resistance
  • Cable route
  • Terminations
  • Physical damage
  • Moisture condition
Cross-Reference

Cross-reference with Division 02 — Electrical Failures and Division 05 — Cable & Connector Failures where applicable.

ALF-06 Connector Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of connectors used within the approach-lighting electrical circuit.

Failure Modes
  • Loose connection
  • Poor contact
  • Corrosion
  • Moisture ingress
  • High contact resistance
  • Connector damage
Consequences
  • Intermittent light
  • Reduced output
  • Complete fixture failure
  • Local overheating
Cross-Reference

Cross-reference with Division 05 — Cable & Connector Failures.

ALF-07 Transformer Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of an isolation transformer or other transformer associated with an approach-lighting fixture/circuit.

Possible Failure Modes
  • Open circuit
  • Short circuit
  • Insulation breakdown
  • Overheating
  • Water ingress
  • Connector failure
  • Lead failure
Consequences
  • Individual light outage
  • Group outage
  • Circuit degradation
Cross-Reference

Cross-reference with Division 04 — Isolation Transformer Failures.

B
Structural & Mechanical Failures
5 topics
ALF-08 Structure Damage
Failure Definition

Physical damage to an approach-lighting support structure.

Possible Causes
  • Vehicle impact
  • Severe weather
  • Corrosion
  • Construction activity
  • Mechanical stress
  • Ageing
Possible Consequences
  • Fixture displacement
  • Misalignment
  • Crossbar/pole damage
  • Frangible-component failure
  • Complete loss of lighting position
ALF-09 Crossbar Damage
Failure Definition

Damage, deformation or failure of a crossbar supporting approach-light fixtures.

Possible Causes
  • Wind/storm
  • Vehicle/equipment impact
  • Corrosion
  • Structural fatigue
  • Improper installation
Consequences
  • Fixture displacement
  • Alignment error
  • Structural instability
  • Multiple fixture failures
Investigation — Inspect
  • Crossbar
  • Joints
  • Supports
  • Fasteners
  • Fixture mounts
  • Alignment
ALF-10 Pole Damage
Failure Definition

Damage, deformation or failure of poles supporting approach-lighting equipment.

Possible Causes
  • Impact
  • Wind loading
  • Corrosion
  • Structural fatigue
  • Foundation movement
Consequences
  • Fixture misalignment
  • Structural instability
  • Multiple fixture outage
  • Potential collapse
ALF-11 Foundation Failure
Failure Definition

Failure or deterioration of the foundation supporting approach-lighting structures.

Possible Causes
  • Settlement
  • Cracking
  • Water ingress
  • Drainage problems
  • Soil movement
  • Structural deterioration
Consequences
  • Pole movement
  • Crossbar movement
  • Fixture misalignment
  • Structural instability
Failure Chain
FOUNDATION FAILUREPOLE MOVEMENTFIXTURE MISALIGNMENTAPPROACH-LIGHTING PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION
ALF-12 Frangible-Component Failure
Failure Definition

Failure or damage of a frangible coupling/component intended to provide the required frangible characteristic of an approach-lighting structure.

Possible Causes
  • Vehicle impact
  • Mechanical overload
  • Incorrect installation
  • Corrosion
  • Ageing
  • Improper replacement
Investigation
  • Frangible component
  • Correct type/specification
  • Installation condition
  • Breakaway condition
  • Associated structure
Cross-Reference

Cross-reference with Division 06 — Mechanical & Structural Failures.

C
Optical & Alignment Failures
2 topics
ALF-13 Misalignment
Failure Definition

Approach-lighting fixture or supporting structure is no longer correctly aligned with its intended design position.

Possible Causes
  • Structural movement
  • Foundation settlement
  • Pole damage
  • Crossbar movement
  • Incorrect installation
  • Maintenance error
  • Vehicle impact
Consequences
  • Incorrect light direction
  • Reduced visual effectiveness
  • Pattern distortion
  • Approach-lighting non-compliance
Investigation — Verify
  • Horizontal orientation
  • Vertical orientation
  • Fixture position
  • Structure position
  • Approved layout/design reference
ALF-14 Optical Degradation
Failure Definition

Deterioration of the optical performance of an approach-lighting fixture without necessarily producing a complete outage.

Possible Causes
  • Lens contamination
  • Optical damage
  • LED degradation
  • Lamp ageing
  • Moisture
  • UV exposure
  • Internal optical deterioration
Consequences
  • Reduced intensity
  • Incorrect light distribution
  • Reduced conspicuity
  • Pattern inconsistency
Investigation — Inspect
  • Lens
  • Prism
  • Reflector/optical assembly
  • Light source
  • Contamination
  • Photometric performance where applicable
D
Environmental Failures
2 topics
ALF-15 Moisture Ingress
Failure Definition

Entry of water or moisture into approach-lighting fixtures, transformers, connectors, structures or associated equipment.

Possible Causes
  • Seal failure
  • Damaged housing
  • Cable-entry failure
  • Heavy rain
  • Flooding
  • Condensation
Consequences
  • Corrosion
  • Electrical leakage
  • Short circuit
  • Optical degradation
  • Component failure
Investigation — Look For
  • Water marks
  • Condensation
  • Corrosion
  • Damaged seals
  • Cable-entry defects
  • Drainage problems
Cross-Reference

Cross-reference with Division 09 — Environmental Failures.

ALF-16 Corrosion
Failure Definition

Corrosion affecting approach-lighting fixtures, structures, poles, crossbars, fasteners, connectors or other components.

Possible Causes
  • Coastal exposure
  • Salt
  • Moisture
  • Poor protective coating
  • Ageing
  • Chemical/environmental exposure
Consequences
  • Structural weakening
  • Connector failure
  • Mounting failure
  • Frangible-component deterioration
  • Optical/housing deterioration
Failure Chain
MOISTURE/SALT EXPOSURECORROSIONSTRUCTURAL DETERIORATIONMISALIGNMENT/FAILURE
E
Circuit & Control Failures
2 topics
ALF-17 Circuit Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of the electrical circuit supplying one or more approach-lighting fixtures.

Possible Failure Modes
  • Open circuit
  • Short circuit
  • Earth fault
  • Insulation breakdown
  • High-resistance connection
  • Transformer failure
  • Cable failure
Consequences
  • Single fixture outage
  • Multiple fixture outage
  • Sectional outage
  • Complete approach-lighting outage
Investigation — Trace
CCRPRIMARY SERIES CIRCUITISOLATION TRANSFORMERSECONDARY CONNECTIONFIXTURE
ALF-18 Control Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of the system used to control, monitor or select approach-lighting operation.

Possible Causes
  • Control-system failure
  • Communication loss
  • Incorrect configuration
  • Switching failure
  • Control-panel failure
  • Remote-control failure
Consequences
  • Lights unavailable
  • Incorrect lighting state
  • Incorrect intensity/selection where applicable
  • Loss of remote control
Cross-Reference

Cross-reference with Division 07 — Control System Failures.

F
System-Level Failures
2 topics
ALF-19 Multiple Approach-Light Failure
Failure Definition

Failure of multiple approach-light fixtures or sections during the same incident or related failure event.

Possible Causes
  • Circuit failure
  • CCR failure
  • Power loss
  • Common cable failure
  • Control failure
  • Severe weather
  • Structural event
Important Investigation Principle

Look for the common cause, rather than treating every failed fixture independently. For example:

COMMON CIRCUIT FAULTMULTIPLE TRANSFORMERS UNAVAILABLEMULTIPLE APPROACH LIGHTS OUT
Severity

Multiple approach-light failures should normally receive greater investigation priority than an isolated fixture failure because they may indicate a common-mode system vulnerability.

ALF-20 Weather-Related Damage
Failure Definition

Approach-lighting equipment or structures are damaged or rendered unavailable due to severe environmental/weather conditions.

Possible Causes
  • High wind
  • Storm
  • Heavy rain
  • Lightning
  • Flooding
  • Extreme temperature
  • Sand/dust
  • Coastal conditions
Possible Consequences
  • Pole damage
  • Crossbar damage
  • Fixture damage
  • Cable damage
  • Moisture ingress
  • Multiple light failures
  • Circuit failure
Investigation — Record
  • Weather event
  • Wind condition
  • Rainfall
  • Flooding
  • Lightning activity
  • Equipment affected
  • Structural damage
  • Number of lights affected
Cross-Reference

Cross-reference with Division 09 — Environmental Failures.

No topics match your search.

Division-Wide Requirements

Standard record structure, failure-chain relationships, diagnostic matrix, RCA linkage, evidence layer and severity scheme that apply across all 20 Division 13 failure topics.

A. Recommended Division 13 Failure Record

Every Division 13 failure should ideally be converted into a standard failure record with the following fields:

Asset Identification

  • Failure ID
  • Airport
  • Runway
  • Approach direction
  • Approach-lighting system/type
  • Light station/position
  • Fixture ID
  • Structure ID
  • Circuit ID
  • Date/time

Failure Information

  • Failure category
  • Failure mode
  • Component affected
  • Number of affected fixtures
  • Number of affected structures
  • Circuit condition
  • Control condition

Structural Condition

  • Pole condition
  • Crossbar condition
  • Foundation condition
  • Frangible component
  • Mounting condition
  • Alignment

Electrical Condition

  • Cable condition
  • Connector condition
  • Transformer condition
  • Lamp/LED condition
  • Driver condition

Optical Condition

  • Lens/optics
  • Contamination
  • Optical output
  • Light distribution
  • Photometric condition where applicable

Environmental Condition

  • Moisture
  • Corrosion
  • Weather event
  • Wind/storm exposure
  • Flooding/water condition

RCA

  • Immediate cause
  • Failure mechanism
  • Contributing factor
  • Root cause

Corrective Action

  • Component replacement
  • Cable/connector repair
  • Transformer replacement
  • Structural repair
  • Foundation repair
  • Alignment correction
  • Optical correction
  • Weather protection

Verification

  • Electrical test
  • Functional test
  • Alignment verification
  • Visual inspection
  • Photometric verification where applicable
  • Final acceptance
  • Return to service

Reliability

  • Previous occurrence
  • Repeat failure
  • Downtime
  • MTTR
  • Preventive action
  • Lessons learned

B. Failure-Chain Relationships

Division 13 becomes much more valuable when the database captures relationships between failure modes rather than treating each as isolated.

Chain 1 — Individual Fixture
LED/LAMP FAILUREAPPROACH FIXTURE FAILUREINDIVIDUAL APPROACH LIGHT OUTAGEAPPROACH-LIGHTING PATTERN DEGRADATION
Chain 2 — Circuit
CABLE FAILURECIRCUIT FAILUREMULTIPLE APPROACH-LIGHT FAILUREAPPROACH-LIGHTING SERVICE DEGRADATION
Chain 3 — Structural
FOUNDATION FAILUREPOLE MOVEMENTCROSSBAR MOVEMENTFIXTURE MISALIGNMENTOPTICAL PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION
Chain 4 — Weather
SEVERE WEATHERSTRUCTURE DAMAGEPOLE/CROSSBAR DAMAGEMULTIPLE FIXTURE DISPLACEMENT/FAILUREAPPROACH-LIGHTING OUTAGE
Chain 5 — Moisture
SEAL/HOUSING DETERIORATIONMOISTURE INGRESSCORROSIONELECTRICAL/OPTICAL FAILUREFIXTURE OUTAGE
Chain 6 — Vehicle Impact
VEHICLE IMPACTFRANGIBLE-COMPONENT FAILUREFIXTURE/STRUCTURE DAMAGEMISALIGNMENT OR FIXTURE OUTAGEAPPROACH-LIGHTING PATTERN DEGRADATION

C. Approach-Lighting Failure Diagnostic Matrix

No.FailurePrimary Investigation
1Approach fixture failureComplete fixture condition
2Lamp failureLamp/output
3LED failureLED/module condition
4Driver failureDriver input/output
5Cable failureCable continuity/insulation
6Connector failureContact/connection
7Transformer failureTransformer electrical condition
8Structure damageStructural integrity
9Crossbar damageCrossbar/support condition
10Pole damagePole integrity/alignment
11Foundation failureFoundation/civil condition
12Frangible-component failureFrangible component
13MisalignmentFixture/structure alignment
14Optical degradationOptical performance
15Moisture ingressSealing/enclosure condition
16CorrosionStructural/electrical condition
17Circuit failureSeries-circuit condition
18Control failureControl/communication
19Multiple approach-light failureCommon-cause investigation
20Weather-related damageEnvironmental event/damage

D. Failure → RCA → Action → Reliability Loop

Every approach-lighting failure should eventually become engineering intelligence:

FAILURE EVENT FAILURE MODE FAILURE MECHANISM ROOT CAUSE CORRECTIVE ACTION PREVENTIVE ACTION POST-REPAIR TEST

For example: Multiple approach-light failure → Common circuit fault → Cable insulation breakdown → Moisture ingress → Cable replacement → Review sealing/drainage → Post-repair insulation test.

E. RCA Connection

Division 13 links every failure to the Root Cause Analysis Database. The most relevant RCA categories for approach-lighting failures are:

ElectricalStructuralOpticalEnvironmentalInstallationMaintenanceDesignManufacturingMaterialComponentHumanProceduralOperationalUnknown/Pending

F. Failure Severity

Every failure receives a severity classification, plus operational-impact tagging:

Critical / Safety-Critical — immediate operational or safety risk

Major / Operationally Critical — significant availability impact

Moderate — reduced performance, not yet critical

Minor / Non-Critical — limited or no operational effect

Degradation / Intermittent / Latent — developing or hidden fault

G. Evidence Layer

Visual evidence

  • Fixture, structure and mounting photographs
  • Crossbar, pole, foundation and frangible-component photographs
  • Corrosion, moisture ingress and weather-damage photographs

Technical evidence

  • Continuity, insulation resistance, electrical output
  • Alignment survey, photometric readings where applicable
  • Weather records, test reports, maintenance history

Failure Database vs. Troubleshooting Atlas

The Troubleshooting Atlas answers “I have a fault now — how do I diagnose and fix it?” The Failure Database answers “this failure happened — what happened, why, what evidence proves it, what was done, and how do we stop it recurring?” Kept strictly separate, then linked end-to-end, the two form a genuine AGL Failure Intelligence Engine rather than a simple fault list. Division 13 connects directly with Division 02 Electrical Failures, Division 04 Isolation Transformer Failures, Division 05 Cable & Connector Failures, Division 06 Mechanical & Structural Failures, Division 07 Control System Failures, Division 09 Environmental Failures, Division 18 Maintenance-Induced Failures, Division 19 Product & Component Reliability, Division 21 RCA and Division 23 Reliability Trend Analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers about approach-lighting failures, as covered in Division 13 of the AGL Failure Database.

Q1What is Division 13 — Approach Lighting Failures in the AGL Failure Database?

Division 13 covers failures in approach-lighting systems. It contains 20 published topics (ALF-01 to ALF-20) spanning fixture, lamp, LED, driver, cable, connector and transformer failures, structural and frangible-component damage, misalignment, optical degradation, moisture, corrosion, circuit and control failures, and weather-related damage.

Q2Which approach-lighting failures does Division 13 cover?

Approach fixture failure, lamp, LED, driver, cable, connector and transformer failure, structure damage, crossbar damage, pole damage, foundation failure, frangible-component failure, misalignment, optical degradation, moisture ingress, corrosion, circuit failure, control failure, multiple approach-light failure and weather-related damage.

Q3How are the 20 approach-lighting topics grouped?

They fall into six groups: Lighting & Component Failures (7 topics), Structural & Mechanical Failures (5), Optical & Alignment Failures (2), Environmental Failures (2), Circuit & Control Failures (2) and System-Level Failures (2).

Q4What approach-lighting failure chains does Division 13 capture?

In the individual-fixture chain, an LED or lamp failure leads to approach fixture failure, an individual approach-light outage and approach-lighting pattern degradation. In the circuit chain, a cable failure leads to circuit failure and multiple approach-light failure.

Q5Where should the investigation start for an approach-lighting failure?

The diagnostic matrix assigns a primary investigation to each topic. Approach fixture failure starts with complete fixture condition, lamp failure with lamp output, LED failure with LED/module condition, driver failure with driver input and output, cable failure with continuity and insulation, connector failure with contact and connection, transformer failure with transformer electrical condition, and structure damage with structural integrity.

Q6How does an approach-lighting failure become engineering intelligence?

Every failure follows a loop: failure event, failure mode, failure mechanism, root cause, corrective action, preventive action and post-repair test. For example, a multiple approach-light failure is traced to a common circuit fault, then to cable insulation breakdown caused by moisture ingress, leading to cable replacement, a review of sealing and drainage, and a post-repair test.

Q7How are failure severity and operational impact classified?

Every failure receives a severity classification, plus operational-impact tagging. The classes are Critical / Safety-Critical (immediate operational or safety risk), Major / Operationally Critical (significant availability impact), Moderate (reduced performance, not yet critical), Minor / Non-Critical (limited or no operational effect), and Degradation / Intermittent / Latent (a developing or hidden fault).

Q8How does the Failure Database differ from the Troubleshooting Atlas?

The Troubleshooting Atlas answers “I have a fault now — how do I diagnose and fix it?” The Failure Database answers “this failure happened — what happened, why, what evidence proves it, what was done, and how do we stop it recurring?” Kept strictly separate, then linked end to end, the two form an AGL Failure Intelligence Engine rather than a simple fault list.

Beyond the Dark Bar

DON’T JUST RELAMP THE BAR. UNDERSTAND THE CIRCUIT BEHIND IT.

A dark light bar in an ALSF, MALSR or SSALR system can trace back to a lamp, a series-circuit fault, a flasher failure or a CCR issue — real troubleshooting means understanding approach lighting circuit architecture well enough to isolate the actual fault.

Take that knowledge further with Precision AGL Academy.

Build Practical AGL Troubleshooting Skills

Learn how to connect:

Failure Symptoms System Understanding Investigation Root Cause Corrective Action Verification Recurrence Prevention

Develop structured knowledge across AGL fundamentals, components, electrical systems, testing, photometry, troubleshooting, maintenance and commissioning.

Find the failure. Understand the cause. Build the engineering skill.

Talk to Precision AGL Academy

Follow the Academy