PAPI versus APAPI: what is the difference?

Four units against two. The same white-above, red-below code, but the PAPI shows the error in finer steps.

HIGHLOWAIRCRAFT HEIGHT RELATIVE TO THE APPROACH SLOPEPAPI4 UNITS · 5 STEPSALL WHITEHIGH3 WHITE · 1 REDSLIGHTLY HIGH2 WHITE · 2 REDON SLOPE1 WHITE · 3 REDSLIGHTLY LOWALL REDLOWAPAPI2 UNITS · 3 STEPSBOTH WHITEHIGH1 WHITE · 1 REDON SLOPEBOTH REDLOWPILOT’S VIEW OF THE WING BAR · SCHEMATIC
white — the aircraft is above the slope
green outline — on the slope
red — the aircraft is below the slope
The Fact ICAO Annex 14 · FAA AC 150/5340-30

The PAPI and the APAPI (abbreviated PAPI) work in the same way. Each unit shows white above its setting angle and red below it, with a sharp change between the two. The units are set at slightly different angles, so the pilot sees a different mix of white and red at each height.

The difference is the number of units. A PAPI has four, so it gives five steps from all white to all red, and the pilot is on slope with two white and two red. An APAPI has two, so it gives three steps, and the pilot is on slope with one white and one red. More units give finer feedback; fewer units cost less and need less equipment.

FeaturePAPIAPAPI
Units in the wing bar42
Indications5 steps, all white to all red3 steps, both white to both red
On slope2 white · 2 red1 white · 1 red
FeedbackFiner: error shows in more stepsCoarser: fewer steps
Equipment and cableMore units to supply and alignFewer units, less equipment
Typical roleWider range of runways and aircraftRunways with smaller aircraft

In both systems the wing bar is normally placed on the left side of the runway, as seen by the approaching pilot, and a second bar may be added on the other side where the standard permits or requires it. The setting angles, the unit spacing and the distance from the threshold come from the standard and the manufacturer’s data.

The diagram is schematic and shows the pilot’s view only. Which system to use depends on the runway and the aircraft that use it, so take the choice and the layout from ICAO Annex 14, the FAA advisory circulars and the manufacturer’s data.
Entry 24 · Visual guidance comparison Entry 26 · VASI versus PAPI

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1What is the difference between a PAPI and an APAPI?

A PAPI uses four light units in a wing bar. An APAPI, the abbreviated PAPI, uses two. Both use white above the slope and red below it, but the PAPI shows more steps between all white and all red, so it gives finer guidance.

Q2How many indications does each system give?

A PAPI gives five: all white, three white and one red, two white and two red, one white and three red, and all red. An APAPI gives three: both white, one white and one red, and both red.

Q3Do both systems use the same colour code?

Yes. White means the aircraft is above the slope, and red means it is below. On the slope the pilot sees a mix of white and red: two of each on a PAPI, and one of each on an APAPI.

Q4Is an APAPI less accurate than a PAPI?

It gives coarser feedback, because there are fewer steps between high and low. The lights are aimed to the same approach slope in both cases. Where each system is used is set by the standard, and it depends on the aircraft that use the runway.

Q5Can I choose between them from this page?

No. The choice depends on the runway, the aircraft that use it and the applicable standard. Use this page to see how the two systems differ, and take the design decision from ICAO Annex 14, the FAA advisory circulars and the manufacturer’s data.

Precision AGL Academy

See It. Understand It. Then Learn How to Engineer It.

Recognising an AGL system visually is the first step. The next step is knowing how to design, install, test, commission and maintain them correctly.

Build Practical AGL Engineering Skills

Go deeper with structured training from Precision AGL Academy, covering:

AGL Fundamentals Design & Electrical Engineering Approach Lighting Photometry Installation & Commissioning Maintenance & Troubleshooting

Learn how each light, sign and circuit works as part of a complete airport lighting system, not just as an isolated diagram.

See. Understand. Apply. Engineer.