AGL Component Library By Precision AGL Academy

Visibility Sensor

A precision optical instrument that measures atmospheric visibility and Runway Visual Range (RVR), providing critical data for low-visibility operations and airfield safety. Available in forward scatter, transmissometer, and backscatter configurations.

Visibility Sensor

Image disclaimer: For identification and illustration only. It may show a product by another manufacturer and may not depict the exact item described; it is not a statement of any product’s quality, approval or performance. Third-party image and trademark rights belong to their owners. See full notice.

Overview

What Is It?

A Visibility Sensor is a meteorological instrument used to measure atmospheric visibility, specifically the Meteorological Optical Range (MOR) and Runway Visual Range (RVR). It is a critical component of airfield weather systems, providing data that determines the operational status of the aerodrome, especially for low-visibility procedures (CAT I, II, III). Visibility sensors operate on the principle of light extinction or scattering: either measuring the attenuation of a light beam over a known distance (transmissometer) or measuring the scattering of light from a small volume of air (forward scatter sensor). The sensor outputs a visibility value in metres or kilometres, which is used by ATC, pilots, and automated systems for safe operations.

Purpose

Purpose & Function

A visibility sensor exists to give the airfield an objective, continuously updated read on how far a pilot can actually see through the atmosphere, which is the single factor that most directly gates low-visibility operations. Because MOR and RVR values are what set CAT I/II/III minima, an airport's ability to keep operating safely in fog, haze, rain, or snow depends on trusting this number rather than a subjective estimate from a single observer at one point on the field.

The sensor's role becomes most critical exactly when conditions are worst: as visibility drops toward the threshold where an approach can no longer legally continue, accurate, real-time data is what allows ATC and pilots to make that go/no-go call with confidence, rather than discovering the runway environment isn't visible only during the final seconds of an approach.

Application

Where Is It Used?

Installed at airfields as part of the meteorological observation system, typically located near the touchdown zone of each runway, and sometimes at the mid‑point or stop end. Visibility sensors are used for RVR reporting, which is mandatory for precision approach runways. They are also used at remote airstrips, heliports, and offshore platforms where visibility data is essential for flight safety. The sensors are mounted on masts or poles at a height of approximately 2.5 metres above the runway surface, in accordance with ICAO recommendations.

Placement

Installation & Location

Mounted on a mast or pole beside the runway strip at each required measurement point, typically the touchdown zone, with additional units at the mid-point and stop end on precision-approach runways, set at approximately 2.5 m above the runway surface in line with ICAO guidance. The sensor's transmitter and receiver (or the forward-scatter sample volume) are aligned along the anticipated line of sight so the reading is representative of the visibility a pilot would experience, and the mast is positioned clear of the obstacle-free zone at the mandated lateral offset from the runway edge. Power and data cabling run underground in duct back to the AWOS/RVR processing cabinet, and the optical heads are orientated to minimise direct low-sun glare, which can otherwise skew scatter-based readings.

Function

How Does It Work?

A forward scatter visibility sensor emits a pulse of infrared or visible light into a small sampling volume of air. A receiver, positioned at a specific scatter angle (typically 35° or 42°), measures the amount of light scattered by atmospheric particles (aerosols, fog, rain, snow). The scattered light intensity is proportional to the extinction coefficient, which is then converted into MOR (Meteorological Optical Range) using the Koschmieder relationship. Transmissometers, on the other hand, use a separate transmitter and receiver separated by a known baseline (typically 30 to 75 metres); the attenuation of the light beam directly yields the visibility. The sensor outputs digital or analogue signals to the weather processing system, which calculates RVR using ambient light and background luminance corrections.

Architecture

System Architecture & Control Logic

Where a runway has visibility sensors at more than one point, the system's real decision logic sits above the individual sensors, in the AWOS processor that combines them: it selects the controlling value — normally the lowest MOR/RVR among the fitted positions relevant to the operation — rather than reporting each sensor's reading in isolation, since a single obscured section of runway is enough to limit the approach regardless of what the other positions show. Each sensor also continuously self-monitors its own optical path: window contamination, condensation, or heater failure can degrade a reading without an obvious fault, so most units run heated optics and a contamination-check routine, reporting that health status to the processor alongside the raw measurement so a fouled sensor can be down-weighted or excluded rather than silently pulling the controlling value in the wrong direction. From there, the same processor layer that handles RVR calculation distributes the controlling value onward to ATC displays and METAR/ATIS reporting, and — on integrated sites — offers it as an input the ALCMS can use when recommending or auto-selecting a runway lighting intensity step.

TDZ Position MOR reading + optical health Mid-Point Position MOR reading + optical health Stop-End Position MOR reading + optical health AWOS PROCESSOR Selects the controlling (lowest) value Excludes fouled/degraded units Applies ambient-light correction ATC Tower Display Controlling value shown live METAR / ATIS Reporting Broadcast to pilots & operators ALCMS Intensity Recommendation Optional link — where systems are integrated
Measurement Logic

Two Ways to Measure the Same Thing

Forward Scatter Sensor Transmitter Receiver 35–42° Sample volume (fog/rain scatters light) Scattered Light → Extinction Coeff. Koschmieder relationship → MOR Transmissometer Transmitter Receiver Baseline: 30 / 75 / 150m Beam Attenuation Measured Direct extinction → visibility Both Feed Ambient-Light-Corrected RVR to the Weather System
Direct beam (transmissometer)
Scattered light (forward scatter)
Construction

Physical Construction

A visibility sensor is built around either a forward-scatter optical head, with transmitter and receiver arms angled toward a common sample volume, or a transmissometer configuration with transmitter and receiver units mounted a fixed, calibrated baseline distance apart. The optical housings are weatherproof enclosures, typically aluminium or composite construction rated to IP66/IP67, with heated lens hoods or windows to prevent condensation, frost, or precipitation from degrading the optical path. The sensor arms or transmitter/receiver towers are mounted on a rigid pole or frame set at the standard reference height, engineered to hold precise optical alignment against wind loading and vibration, since drift between the transmitter and receiver directly affects measurement accuracy. Internal electronics for signal processing are housed in a sealed enclosure at the base of the mounting structure or integrated into the optical head itself, connected by shielded, weather-rated cable. Corrosion-resistant materials and fasteners are used throughout given the sensor's typically exposed siting close to the runway or in open terrain.

Specification

Technical Parameters

ParameterTypical Value
Measurement Range (MOR)10 m – 20,000 m (or 0.005 – 12 miles)
Accuracy (MOR)±10% (for MOR < 600 m), ±15% (for MOR ≥ 600 m)
Wavelength880 nm (infrared) or 550 nm (visible, photopic)
Scatter Angle (forward scatter)35° – 42° (typical)
Baseline (transmissometer)30 m, 75 m, or 150 m
Output Signal4–20 mA, 0–10V, RS-232, RS-485, SDI-12, or Ethernet
Mounting Height2.5 m above runway surface (ICAO)
Protection ClassIP66 / IP67 (weatherproof)
Operating Temperature-40°C to +60°C
Power Supply

Electrical Requirements

RequirementTypical Value
Power Supply100–240V AC, 50/60Hz (or 24V DC on remote-powered installations)
Power Consumption~50–150W, including optics/window heater load
Heater ElementsIntegrated anti-icing/anti-condensation heaters on lens/window and transmitter or receiver housing
Signal/Data CableShielded twisted-pair, RS-485, or Ethernet run to AWOS/ALCMS data logger
Surge ProtectionLightning and surge arrestors on both power and signal lines
Earthing/GroundingSensor housing and mounting mast bonded to airfield earth grid
Backup PowerUPS or battery backup recommended for continuous visibility reporting
Power SourceDedicated circuit from AWOS power distribution panel or airfield electrical supply
Compliance

Applicable Standards

ICAO Annex 3

Meteorological service requirements for RVR and visibility reporting

FAA AC 150/5220-16

Airport weather observation systems (AWOS) requirements

WMO No. 8 (Guide to Instruments)

Visibility measurement instrument specifications

ICAO Doc 9328

Manual of Runway Visual Range Observing and Reporting Practices

Prerequisites

Installation Requirements

Mast Foundation & Lateral Clearance
Civil

Set the mast foundation clear of the obstacle-free zone at the mandated lateral offset from the runway edge.

Measurement Point Positioning
Civil

Site sensors at each required measurement point — typically the touchdown zone, with additional units at mid-point and stop end on precision-approach runways.

Cable Route to Processing Cabinet
Electrical

Run power and data cabling underground in duct back to the AWOS/RVR processing cabinet.

Optical Alignment
Mechanical

Set the sensor at approximately 2.5 m above the runway surface with the transmitter/receiver or sample volume aligned along the anticipated line of sight.

Baseline Distance Setting
Mechanical

For transmissometer configurations, confirm the transmitter and receiver units are set at the fixed, calibrated baseline distance the design requires.

Sun-Angle Orientation Check
Mechanical

Orientate the optical heads to minimise direct low-sun glare, which can otherwise skew scatter-based readings.

Heated Lens Wiring
Electrical

Terminate the heated lens hood/window circuit so condensation, frost, or precipitation cannot degrade the optical path.

Pre-Energisation Sign-off
Documentation

Record mast position, cable route, and optical alignment as-built for each measurement point before commissioning.

Verification

Testing & Commissioning

Insulation Resistance & Continuity Test
Pre-Energisation

Megger-test power cabling and verify signal cable continuity before the sensor is energised, ruling out faults introduced during installation.

Power-Up & Self-Diagnostics
Energisation

Energise the sensor and confirm it passes its internal self-diagnostic routine with no fault codes before proceeding to calibration.

Forward-Scatter Calibration Check
Functional Test

Verify the scatter measurement against a certified reference scatter plate or calibration standard at the specified scatter angle.

Transmissometer Baseline Alignment
Functional Test

For transmissometer types, confirm the transmitter and receiver baseline is correctly aligned and the beam path is free of obstruction.

MOR Accuracy Verification
Functional Test

Compare the calculated Meteorological Optical Range against a reference instrument reading across the operating range.

Optics Cleanliness Check
Functional Test

Inspect and clean sampling volume optics, confirming contamination-compensation readings are within normal range after cleaning.

Communications & Output Interface Test
Final Acceptance

Confirm visibility values report correctly to the weather processing system at the specified reporting interval before handover.

Documentation & As-Built Sign-off
Final Acceptance

Record calibration, alignment, and communications test results alongside as-built position in the commissioning dossier for handover.

Upkeep

Inspection & Maintenance

Calibration Verification
Annual

Check sensor output against a certified reference instrument across the measurement range to confirm the ±10%/±15% MOR accuracy specification is still being met.

Optical Window Cleaning
Monthly

Clean the forward-scatter or transmissometer optical windows, since dust, insects, or condensation on the optics directly skews visibility readings feeding low-visibility operations.

Sensor Alignment Check
Annual

Confirm the forward-scatter angle or transmissometer baseline alignment remains within tolerance, since drift here degrades measurement accuracy without an obvious fault indication.

Output Signal & Communication Link Test
Semi-annual

Confirm the sensor's 4-20mA/0-10V/RS-485/SDI-12/Ethernet output reaches the AWOS or ALCMS correctly and without signal noise.

Heater / De-icing Function Check
Annual

Test any heating elements on the optical housing ahead of the icing season, since frost or ice on the sensor optics can cause false low-visibility readings.

Seal & Weatherproofing Inspection
Annual

Check housing seals and gaskets for cracking or degradation and confirm the IP66/IP67 rating is still intact.

Mounting Height & Alignment Verification
Annual

Confirm the sensor remains at the ICAO-specified 2.5m mounting height above the runway surface, since ground settlement or resurfacing can shift this over time.

Cable & Connector Inspection
Annual

Examine signal and power wiring for corrosion or loose terminations, a common source of erratic or dropped-out readings.

Field Notes

Common Field Issues

Lens Contamination and Window Fouling

Dust, dirt, bird droppings, and de-icing fluids can accumulate on the optical windows, reducing signal strength and causing underestimation of visibility. Regular cleaning with lens-safe solutions and soft cloths is essential, especially during winter and high‑pollution periods.

Calibration Drift and Alignment

Electronic drift and mechanical misalignment (especially for transmissometers) can lead to measurement errors. Annual calibration using certified reference standards and optical alignment checks are required to maintain accuracy within ICAO tolerances.

Icing and Snow Accumulation

In cold climates, ice can form on the optical windows or the sensor housing, blocking the light path. Heated window options are available, but regular visual inspection and de-icing procedures are recommended to ensure uninterrupted operation.

Lightning and Power Surges

Sensors mounted on masts are susceptible to lightning strikes and voltage surges. Proper surge protection, grounding, and uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) are critical to prevent damage and data loss.

Diagnostics

Troubleshooting Guide

One Sensor Excluded from the Controlling MOR/RVR Value
Likely Cause
The sensor's self-monitoring has flagged window contamination, condensation, or heater failure, causing the AWOS processor to down-weight or exclude it from the controlling-value calculation.
Diagnostic Steps
Check the flagged sensor's reported optical health status alongside its raw measurement; inspect the optical windows for contamination; verify the heated optics/hood is functioning if condensation or frost is suspected.
Corrective Action
Clean the affected optical windows and re-check; repair or replace the heater element if the heated optics have failed; confirm the sensor is re-included in the controlling-value calculation once healthy.
Reported Visibility Lower Than Actual Conditions
Likely Cause
Dust, dirt, bird droppings, or de-icing fluid on the optical windows attenuating the light path and causing the sensor to underestimate visibility.
Diagnostic Steps
Visually inspect optical windows for contamination; compare the sensor's reading against a nearby reference sensor or observed conditions to confirm the discrepancy is optical rather than a genuine local visibility difference.
Corrective Action
Clean the optical windows with lens-safe solutions and soft cloths; re-verify the reading matches expected conditions after cleaning.
Transmissometer Reading Drifting Over Time
Likely Cause
Mechanical misalignment between the transmitter and receiver towers, caused by wind loading, vibration, or foundation settlement affecting the fixed calibrated baseline distance.
Diagnostic Steps
Perform an optical alignment check on the transmitter/receiver baseline; inspect the mounting towers and foundations for movement or settlement; compare readings against a certified reference standard.
Corrective Action
Re-align the transmitter and receiver to restore baseline calibration; address foundation settlement or mounting instability if that is the underlying cause of the drift.
Optical Path Blocked by Ice or Snow
Likely Cause
Ice or frost formation on the optical windows or sensor housing, especially where heated window hoods are not fitted or have failed to prevent condensation and precipitation buildup.
Diagnostic Steps
Visually inspect windows and housing for ice/snow buildup during cold-weather conditions; check heated window/hood power and operation if fitted; correlate a sudden drop in reported visibility with weather conditions.
Corrective Action
Manually clear ice/snow following approved de-icing procedure; repair heated window power supply if fitted; consider retrofitting heated windows if icing faults recur at this site.
Sensor Offline or No Output After Storm Activity
Likely Cause
Lightning strike or voltage surge damage to the sensor electronics, particularly likely given the sensor's typically exposed mast-mounted siting close to the runway.
Diagnostic Steps
Check surge protection devices for tripped or blown indicators; inspect grounding continuity; test the UPS backup if the site loses grid power along with the surge event; check sensor output signal for any response.
Corrective Action
Replace blown surge protection devices and restore grounding; replace damaged sensor electronics; verify UPS is holding charge and switching over correctly to prevent recurrence of data loss during future events.
Controlling Value Selection Appears Wrong at AWOS/ALCMS Level
Likely Cause
Where more than one sensor is fitted along the runway, the AWOS processor selects the lowest MOR/RVR among relevant positions as the controlling value — an apparent mismatch usually means one position's data isn't being correctly weighted, not that any single sensor is wrong.
Diagnostic Steps
Check each sensor position's individual reading and health status at the AWOS processor; confirm the controlling-value selection logic is correctly configured to use the lowest relevant reading.
Corrective Action
Resolve the fault at the individual sensor position that is being incorrectly excluded or weighted; escalate a processor-level configuration fault to AWOS system administration if the selection logic itself is misconfigured.
Reliability

Failure Modes & Root Causes

Optical Window Contamination
Low Severity
Root Cause
Dust, dirt, bird droppings, or de-icing fluid accumulating on the optical windows during normal outdoor exposure.
Effect
Reported visibility reads lower than actual conditions, and the sensor's self-monitoring may exclude it from the controlling MOR/RVR value.
Detection Method
Visual inspection of the optical windows, and review of the sensor's reported optical health status alongside its raw measurement.
Transmissometer Baseline Misalignment
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Wind loading, vibration, or foundation settlement gradually shifting the transmitter and receiver towers out of their calibrated baseline.
Effect
Readings drift over time even though the optics themselves remain clean, since the fixed baseline distance underpins the calibration.
Detection Method
Optical alignment check on the transmitter/receiver baseline, and inspection of the mounting towers and foundations for movement.
Heated Optics / Hood Failure
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Failed heater element or power supply on the heated window or hood assembly.
Effect
Condensation, frost, or precipitation builds up on the optics, blocking the light path and dropping reported visibility sharply.
Detection Method
Heated window/hood power and operation check, correlated with a sudden drop in reported visibility during cold-weather conditions.
Calibration Drift
Medium Severity
Root Cause
Electronic drift accumulating over time in the sensor's optical or signal-processing components.
Effect
Readings depart from ICAO tolerances even though the optics are clean and correctly aligned.
Detection Method
Annual calibration using certified reference standards, with results reviewed against calibration history for a progressive trend.
Lightning / Surge Damage
High Severity
Root Cause
A direct or induced lightning strike on the sensor's typically exposed mast-mounted siting near the runway.
Effect
Sensor goes offline or produces no output following storm activity, and may lose recent data if the UPS backup fails to hold.
Detection Method
Check of surge protection devices for tripped or blown indicators, grounding continuity inspection, and a UPS backup test.
Precautions

Safety & Operational Notes

Electrical Isolation Before Servicing
Electrical Safety

De-energise the sensor's mains supply and the separate optics/window heater circuit before opening the transmitter or receiver housing, and verify zero energy before handling connectors.

Hot Surfaces from Heater Elements
Personnel Safety

Allow the integrated anti-icing/anti-condensation heaters on the lens/window and transmitter or receiver housing to cool before handling after active operation.

Airside Work Coordination
Operational

Visibility sensor sites are within or near the movement area for AWOS/ASOS integration; coordinate with ATC and raise a NOTAM where visibility reporting will be degraded or unavailable during the outage.

Optical Alignment Precision
Operational

Whichever measurement principle the unit uses, confirm alignment and signal strength against the manufacturer's procedure rather than by eye alone, since a subtly misaligned unit can still report plausible but inaccurate values.

Optics Cleanliness and Protection
Operational

Cap or shield the optics from direct sunlight and dust ingress whenever the housing is open, since a contaminated or scratched window directly degrades reading accuracy.

PPE and Grounding
Personnel Safety

Use insulated tools on mains-powered connections and confirm the sensor housing bonding and grounding are intact before reconnecting supply.

Restore to Compliant State
Compliance

Verify sensor output against a reference or cross-check with an adjacent sensor before closing out the work, and cancel the associated NOTAM once reporting is confirmed within tolerance.

Field Insight

Engineering & Expert Notes

Window Fouling Biases Visibility Gradually, Not Suddenly
Maintenance

Optical window contamination degrades reported visibility gradually enough that it's easy to miss on a quick visual glance; schedule window cleaning to a defined interval rather than reacting only when a complaint comes in.

A Persistent Disagreement Between Technologies Is Diagnostic
Verification

Where both a transmissometer and a forward-scatter sensor exist at the same location, a consistent disagreement between the two technologies points to a real calibration issue rather than simple sensor noise; treat cross-technology comparison as a diagnostic tool, not just a redundancy nicety.

Re-Verify Siting Against Nearby Lighting Changes
Siting

New lighting installed near the sensor after commissioning can bias the co-located ambient light measurement; re-check siting against nearby light sources periodically rather than assuming the original commissioning survey still holds.

Check Heater Cycling Behaviour, Not Just That It Turns On
Troubleshooting

A defogging heater stuck in the on position can itself introduce a slight bias through localised heat shimmer in extreme cases, while simply confirming the heater powers up doesn't catch a cycling fault; verify the heater's on/off cycling behaviour specifically.

Validate Firmware Updates Against a Known Reference
Configuration

An algorithm update that recalculates visibility from raw scatter counts can shift reported values without any physical change at the sensor; validate readings against a known reference immediately after any firmware update rather than assuming continuity.

Tighten the Cleaning Cadence for Seasonal Insect Activity
Maintenance

Bird and insect activity around sensor optics in certain seasons fouls the optics faster than the general maintenance calendar assumes; adjust the cleaning schedule seasonally rather than applying one fixed interval year-round.

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions

Short answers about visibility sensors: how they work, range, standards and maintenance.

Q1What is a visibility sensor?

A visibility sensor is a meteorological instrument that measures atmospheric visibility, specifically the Meteorological Optical Range (MOR), and supports Runway Visual Range (RVR) reporting as part of an airfield weather system.

Q2How does a forward-scatter visibility sensor work?

It emits a pulse of infrared or visible light into a small sampling volume of air. A receiver at a set scatter angle, typically 35° to 42°, measures the scattered light, which is converted into an extinction coefficient and then MOR.

Q3What is the measurement range of a visibility sensor?

Typically MOR from 10 m to 20,000 m, at an 880 nm infrared or 550 nm visible wavelength. Transmissometer baselines of 30 m, 75 m or 150 m are also used.

Q4Where is a visibility sensor mounted?

At airfields as part of the meteorological observation system, near the runway. The page gives a mounting height of 2.5 m above the runway surface (ICAO).

Q5What is the difference between a visibility sensor and an RVR sensor?

A visibility sensor measures MOR. An RVR system combines that with an ambient light sensor and the runway light intensity setting to report what a pilot can see of the runway lights.

Q6Which standards apply to visibility sensors?

The main references are ICAO Annex 3, ICAO Doc 9328, FAA AC 150/5220-16 and WMO No. 8 (Guide to Instruments).

Q7How often should a visibility sensor be maintained?

Monthly optical window cleaning, and annual calibration verification against a certified reference and alignment checks.

Q8What are the common problems with visibility sensors?

Window fouling from dirt, insects and de-icing fluids, calibration drift and misalignment, ice and snow accumulation in cold climates, and lightning or power surges on masts.

Explore Further

Related Components

Go Further

Go Beyond the Component. Understand the Complete AGL System.

You have explored the component. Now understand how it works within the complete Airfield Ground Lighting system.

Learn AGL from fundamentals to design, installation, testing, photometry, commissioning, maintenance and troubleshooting through structured technical training at Precision AGL Academy.

Build practical knowledge. Understand the circuit. Read the standards. Troubleshoot with confidence.

Your next step in AGL starts here.

The Learning Pathway
Learn Understand Design Test Maintain Document Apply Certify

Need expert guidance on visibility sensor selection, installation, or calibration?

Precision AGL Academy provides advice on RVR system design, sensor placement, and compliance with ICAO and FAA requirements.